[Clfs-dev] Eudev

[William Harrington]

On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:

> Can you elaborate as to why systemd isn't desired?  Especially if udev
> is?

Systemd is a pretty big step right? I don't know much about systemd  
and have never used it.

I was following discussion with it in LFS dev mailing lists and there  
is a Systemd branch, but they are sticking with the more simpler  
extracted udev
I was under the impression to install systemd, we'd have to add quite  
a few more deps in final-system. If we are to keep a minimal system,  
that might be counterproductive.

On the other hand, if systemd is great and all that, we need more devs  
active on the book. Then we'll need to edit cblfs as well for systemd.

I don't know what all work is required, but I wouldn't look forward to  
it, right now.

Sincerely,

William Harrington
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-clfs.org/attachments/20130606/39af494b/attachment-0001.htm>