[Clfs-dev] Eudev

[Andrew Bradford]

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 09:28 AM, William Harrington wrote:
> 
> On Jun 6, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> 
> > Is the goal to not adopt systemd but still get udev type  
> > functionality?
> 
> I'd like that. Some people prefer systemd, others prefer to keep it  
> simple.
> 
> Most of the time users will end up doing their own thing no matter  
> what is in the book.

Can you elaborate as to why systemd isn't desired?  Especially if udev
is?
For better or worse it seems they come together now.

-Andrew