[Clfs-dev] [Clfs-support] Systemd

[Martin Ward]

On 11/12/13 16:27, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Martin Ward wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the book/process could be rearranged  like so, as not every 
>> one will like systemd
>
> There are still lots of people who are weary about moving to systemd. 
> So that is good. Even if CLFS moves to systemd, there can always be a 
> hint or people can look at previous versions to see about sysvinit and 
> eudev. Those don't change much so it wouldn't be too difficult to skip 
> the systemd. Can also use the bootscripts as of late with no issues.
>
> Systemd makes some things much easier, and as far as your experience 
> in getting to the final system, even when using the boot method, can 
> take some work. I don't know when I'll get around to updating the 
> systemd branch, it is very old as it was merged master/origin in 2010. 
> I can merg master to that branch, but there are TONS of issues that 
> have to be made. I may end up merging a fresh master into systemd 
> branch and work from there. We'll see how it goes.
>
> I did do a replay and rebase systemd from master, which worked a bit 
> better, but still quite a bit of changes. I think I had to work out 2 
> issues going that route.
>
> Any git gurus care to comment on the best way to do this?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Harrington
>
Perhaps an incremental approach is what is needed, get the 
infrastructure in place before switching over or have sections

if systemd
     do this
else
     do that

don't know how workable that is

martin