[Clfs-support] a strategy question

Jorge Almeida jjalmeida at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 23:28:31 PST 2012

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:06 PM, William Harrington <berzerkula at cox.net> wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:38 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> Both have toolchains that are newer than the
> recommended versions...
> I'd recommend CLFS dev and not 1.2.0 as dev has been pretty stable for half
> a year or more and is about to be released. We are in a package freeze.
> Builds have been successful, and ironing out some arch specific issues like

OK, will try that.

> internet for any issues that you will encounter. I have an updated lfs
> livecd you can use , and I use it to build CLFS dev builds just fine. It ill
> build 1.0.0 and 1.2.0 just fine.
> http://cross-lfs.org/~kb0iic/livecdupd/
Great. I'll extract the rootfs and use as host.


Jorge Almeida

More information about the Clfs-support mailing list