[Clfs-dev] GIT-20140618-x86_64-Pure64 Boot problems

Martin Ward macros_the_black at ntlworld.com
Fri Jun 20 13:01:09 PDT 2014


On 20/06/14 19:32, Martin Ward wrote:
> On 20/06/14 19:08, William Harrington wrote:
>> On Fri, June 20, 2014 16:00, Martin Ward wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Systemd 213 is causing me problems with a some partitions failing to
>>> mount at boot time ,although the root partition is fine.
>>>
>>> Any additional partitions ones including the swap partition just time
>>> out and drop me into a emergency shell after 90s
>>>
>>> Bit of surfing around seems a few people have had this problem,any body
>>> else seen this, 212 was fine?
>> I use encrypted swap but I have to create a target for systemd.
>> Regular swap should be fine whether it is in /etc/fstab or commented out
>> as systemd generator will generate what is needed for swap.
>>
>> Other users having issues were missing FHANDLE in the kernel sometimes.
> checked that, had it in there
>>
>> I haven't had any issues, but I also enable REQUIRED and OPTIONAL kernel
>> deps as in the systemd README.
> only one i didn't have was the automount, but thats not needed
>>
>> I've booted 32bit, multilib, and Pure 64bit with no issues when I 
>> have all
>> of the required drivers in the kernel.
>>
>> You may wish to investigate that part. I haven't had issues since 
>> Systemd
>> 210 was released. Each systemd upgrade worked fine with the same kernel
>> config.
> same here from about 206, 213 was the only one, tried two builds just 
> in case i missed something, same problem my data and swap partitions 
> didn't want to mount using systemd, but had no problem with eudev and 
> the boot-scripts earlier in the build
> did check the rtc clock  just in case this was the problem, but no
>
> just found this
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40706
>
> and a  possible solution
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=c343be283b7152554bac0c02493a4e1759c163f7 
>
>>
>>
>> As far as KMOD, since the latest kmod upgrade to 17, they fixed this and
>> we didn't remove the install command for the docs.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> William Harrington
>>
> thanks
>
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Clfs-dev mailing list
> Clfs-dev at lists.cross-lfs.org
> http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
>
thanks

should look at the tickets more often, but there are so many


martin



More information about the Clfs-dev mailing list