[Clfs-dev] Tidying the Dependencies

[William Harrington]

On Sep 10, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Martin Ward wrote:

> Something along those lines or do you want more detail
>
>
> Martin


Well making sure we have each package used in the book in the  
rationale and all descriptions are right.

In dependencies, making sure we don't have any missing packages, or  
obsolete entries, and that the dependencies and before sections are  
proper. It's tough tracking it all down.

Example, for KMOD we have deps required to build it. Then it needs to  
be built before..... and then any test suite deps as required.

Like today, we still had module-init-tools listed instead of KMOD, and  
KMOD was missing and there was no Module-Init-Tools.

And I added check to gcc testsuites, for example.

Just making sure that it is all right.

The rational descriptions should be okay as I checked them a couple  
months ago. But if anything looks strange, it needs to be changed.

If there are any parts in the book labeld "NEED TO DO" or to that  
affect, like some program descriptions in the final system, then we  
need to address those, as well.

Sincerely,

William Harrington
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-clfs.org/attachments/20130910/b42c2ca8/attachment-0001.htm>