[Clfs-support] Fwd: CLFS

[Roger Koehler]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Pierre Labastie
<pierre.labastie at neuf.fr> wrote:
> On 18/01/2017 02:05, Roger Koehler wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:39 PM, DJ Lucas <blfs-dev at lucasit.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/16/2017 08:05 PM, Roger Koehler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Roger Koehler
>>>> <roger.o.koehler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Roger Koehler
>>>>> <roger.o.koehler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Roger Koehler
>>>>>> <roger.o.koehler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Roger Koehler
>>>>>>> <roger.o.koehler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:44 PM, DJ Lucas <blfs-dev at lucasit.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So far, I have not been successful building ANY version of CLFS
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is a known good way to build CLFS x86_64 (multilib) from an
>>>>>>>>>> amd64 host?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can do it after regular LFS, but that doesn't fix the CLFS book
>>>>>>>>> or its interaction with jhalfs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just updated from local sources (without testing):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/lfs-multilib-20170115.diff
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As long as you are not opposed to /lib and /usr/lib with /usr/lib32
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> 32bit libs (Debian style). Also, with ISL and gold but ld.bfd
>>>>>>>>> default, this
>>>>>>>>> should work (though I haven't tested it in a while).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --DJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I figured out the patch command:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cd to my LFS SVN directory and then:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> patch -s -p0 < ../lfs-multilib-20170115.diff
>>>>>>
>>>> For some reason, the commands starting with 139-binutils-temp are
>>>> missing the unpack functions.
>>>>
>>> Yes, I'm not sure I tested it with jhalfs yet, completely spaced on that.
>>> Do the unpack functions work with packages after 139 and 140?
>>
>> Yes. Missing for 139, 140, and 141, and again for all of the lib32
>> lfs-commands.

So, I manually updated the Makefile to include the unpack functions on
these steps, and it ran up to 141-glibctemp. I then tried following
the book manually at 6.74. Glibc-2.24 32-bit (temp), but I get the
same error during the configuration step:

checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m32
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
`/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.24/build':
configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details

>From config.log:

configure:2189: checking build system type
configure:2203: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:2223: checking host system type
configure:2236: result: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure:2265: checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
configure:2292: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m32
configure:2561: checking for C compiler version
configure:2570: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 --version >&5
../configure: line 2572: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: command not found

../configure: (lines 2560 - 2583)

# Provide some information about the compiler.
$as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for C compiler version" >&5
set X $ac_compile
ac_compiler=$2
for ac_option in --version -v -V -qversion; do
  { { ac_try="$ac_compiler $ac_option >&5"
case "(($ac_try" in
  *\"* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;
  *) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;
esac
eval ac_try_echo="\"\$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: $ac_try_echo\""
$as_echo "$ac_try_echo"; } >&5
############## The following line is line 2572 ###############
  (eval "$ac_compiler $ac_option >&5") 2>conftest.err
###############################################
  ac_status=$?
  if test -s conftest.err; then
    sed '10a\
... rest of stderr output deleted ...
         10q' conftest.err >conftest.er1
    cat conftest.er1 >&5
  fi
  rm -f conftest.er1 conftest.err
  $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
  test $ac_status = 0; }
done

Any ideas?