[Clfs-support] Future upgrades

Martin Ward macros_the_black at ntlworld.com
Sat Jan 31 14:54:47 PST 2015


On 31/01/15 21:44, William Harrington wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:51:55 +0000
> Martin Ward <macros_the_black at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> On 31/01/15 04:45, William Harrington wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We have had some domain issues, which won't be resolved. You'd expect if someone sent an invoice from the same company to reveal something went awry. Well, we are clfs.org now, unless a miracle occurs.
>>>
>>> Who all is still with CLFS? Let us know.
>>>
>>> I have notes for our tickets at trac.clfs.org.
>>>
>>> I don't have much time to update CLFS as the world is out of whack and going into convulsions, but I do have notes for my last pure64 bit build with binutils 2.25, glibc-2.20, and gcc-4.9.2 with branch updates.  We need a multilib patch for gcc 4.9.2.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> William Harrington
>>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Yes that combination works well, so you mean a specs patch for gcc.4.9.x ?
>>
>> Martin
> gcc-4.8.3-specs-1.patch  Yes, for 4.9.2. I may look at it later and see what all needs to change. I think the main differences from 4.8.3 to 4.9 for specs is additional targets and they changed the layout of gcc configs if I recall. I have the specs for pure64 and 4.9.2. Both the 32bit book and multilib share the same specs patch if I'm correct, too.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William
> .
>
i'll make a ticket and post mine

Martin



More information about the Clfs-support mailing list