[Clfs-support] Systemd branch and main book

[Martin Ward]

On 06/01/14 19:02, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Martin Ward wrote:
>
>>> I wouldn't mind creating a sysvinit branch and removing the systemd 
>>> branch.
>> surely the other wahy round
>  note that newer versions of util linux and procps ng include most of 
> the tools sysvinit provide

yep
>
> The book will be using procps-ng.
> systemd provides init related files -> reboot, init, poweroff, 
> shutdown, halt, etc
yep
>  util-linux provides mesg, last and maybe one more
> procps-ng provides pidof
>
> This leaves fstab-decode and bootlogd for whatever use they are.
>
>>>
>>> I also, wouldn't mind maintaining a book for sysvinit and systemd.
>> hmm
>>>
>>> I also realize that once we implement the simp branch into the main 
>>> book, we could effectively have one branch and if sysvinit build the 
>>> sysvinit book, if systemd, build the systemd book. It's a ways to 
>>> go, but what is the community input about systemd as the main book?
>>>
>> what's the simp branch?
> http://lists.cross-lfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org/2010-May/000795.html 
>

thanks
>
> There is also a trac ticket.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Harrington
>
Was going to post how i did, are you proposing to cross-compile systemd 
and it's dependencies?

martin

martin