[Clfs-support] gcc -Os regression?

William Harrington berzerkula at cox.net
Sun Feb 3 14:09:00 PST 2013


On Feb 3, 2013, at 3:21 PM, david vann wrote:

>  Okay, sorry to hit you guys up with this,  but has anyone else
> noticed the 25% increase in stripped executable size in gcc- 
> post-4.2.4 vs 4.2.4? I cant find *ANYTHING* in bugtraq
> thank you.
> -david
> PS, if anyone would like to see some output of a sample package with  
> the differences, I'd be happy to provide it.

It doesn't matter what is being stripped? The executable is larger  
after stripping than before stripping?

Sincerely,

William Harrington




More information about the Clfs-support mailing list