[Clfs-support] Config question

[boedosoy]

Thank you Andrew.  Those were the other options I selected.
My confusion arose from thinking that the core's version was indicated by
the number after ARM!
Thanks a lot again.
Claudio
On Apr 22, 2011 1:05 PM, "Andrew Bradford" <bradfa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Andrew Bradford <bradfa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:42 PM, boedosoy <boedosoy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 1) AT91RM9200 (ARM920)
>>
>> ARM920 is armv4t
>>
>>> 2) i.MX28 (ARM926)
>>
>> i.MX28 is a ARM926EJ-S core, which is armv5te
>
> Sorry, upon review, I may not have completely answered your question.
>
> For both processors, I'd recommend little endian, arm mode, and the
> EABI (aapcs-linux).
>
> armv4t most likely does not have hard floating point built in. I'd
> recommend using soft floating point.
> armv5te may have a hard floating point unit, but I'm not that familiar
> with Freescale's parts. I believe hard floating point was an option
> for armv5 cores. You're safe doing a soft floating point build but if
> you can find out from Freescale documentation if they included hard
> floating point, use which ever version they have.
>
> Pick your target triplets to be based on your other choices. Use the
> examples in the book as a reference, the examples are definitely not a
> complete list of all available options.
>
> -Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Clfs-support mailing list
> Clfs-support at lists.cross-lfs.org
> http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clfs.org/pipermail/clfs-support-clfs.org/attachments/20110422/0460e2d6/attachment-0001.htm>