[Clfs-support] Coreutils-6.12: help2man error

wwh04660 at ucmo.edu wwh04660 at ucmo.edu
Sat Sep 13 15:15:50 PDT 2008


On Sep 13, 2008, at 4:52 PM, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>
>
> I have a suggestion for the patches:
>
> I'm building my clfs system from my own automated scripts. When I
> install a package, any patches that fix bugs or add missing
> functionality for that package are automatically applied. The scripts
> look for any file that start with the package name followed by a
> dash and the ".patch" extension. If some patches are optional, like
> glibc libgcc_eh patch, I prefix them with "option_" like this:
> option_glibc-2.7-libgcc_eh-1.patch and them I manually apply the  
> patch.
>
> Thus, patches handling is easier since I don't have some patches  
> that I
> apply to build the cross tools, then some different patches to apply
> when I build the temporary filesystem, and then another different set
> of patches to apply when I build the final system.
>
> Hugo V.

Hugo,

   Well, your scripts should apply patches not based on the name, but  
based
when the patches should be supplied. You can dump all the commands if  
you
download the book and run make dump-commands.  Otherwise, your scripts  
need
to be separated for each section. Changing patch names is not our part  
and will
not be done for people who don't want to take the time to build proper  
scripts.
Patches are not optional in some parts. Do you understand what I mean?
The patches aren't optional in some sections. They will be required in  
some
sections. I know this was directed to Joe, but I'm giving Joe a break!

William



More information about the Clfs-support mailing list