<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">Can you elaborate as to why systemd isn't desired?</span></blockquote></div><br><div>I chatted with our release manager, Jonathan Norman, and I"m not sure what he wants to do. I explained that systemd would be a big step and maybe for the next major release. Lots of changes would occur, and then going through cblfs. When moving to cblfs, there will be two different clfs builds out there. Those using udev, those using systemd. It will be a bit of work, and if you look at the history of the last year and a half of the number of people moving this project along, that would not look pretty.</div><div><br></div><div>It could work, it will take a bit more time.</div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div><br></div><div>William Harrington</div></body></html>