<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>At this point forget about the whole libtool dependancy_lib issues. The stuff you see is evidence of crap passing through from tools to the final.<br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: db m <myheadblewoff@hotmail.com><br>To: CLFS development discussion <clfs-dev@lists.cross-lfs.org><br>Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:33:35 AM<br>Subject: Re: [Clfs-dev] broken binutils libtool file<br><br>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;padding:0px;}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE:10pt;FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma;}
</style>
Greets,<br><br>> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:14:39 -0400<br>> From: jciccone<br>> To: clfs-dev<br>> Subject: Re: [Clfs-dev] broken binutils libtool file<br>> <br>> Michael A. Peters wrote:<br>> > clfs 1.1.0 i386 build<br>> ><br>> > Line 20 of /usr/lib/libbfd.la reads:<br>> ><br>> > dependency_libs=' -L/sources/binutils-build/libiberty/pic -liberty'<br>> ><br>> > That clearly is wrong. What should it be, and did I not follow an<br>> > instruction or what it missed?<br>> ><br>> > libtool files are evil.<br><br>Joe said ;<br><br>> I never noticed this before, but this has been the case for years<br>> apparently. I just checked a few builds. Something to fix for the future<br>> I suppose, but obviously not problematic.<br><br>Curious.......my old SVN-20051223 lfs build (32bit) has the same <br>dependency_libs line as above....<br><br>My clfs 1.0.0 from last year (x86_64-64)
quotes ;<br><br>dependency_libs=' '<br><br>My current clfs-1.1.0 (x86_64_multilib) is the same. <br><br>As I've still got the tools/crosstools trees from this build handy, I've discovered <br>this all starts back during these initial stages -- these binutils builds also have<br>the <a target="_blank" href="http://libbfd.la">libbfd.la</a> line ; dependency_libs=' -L/sources/binutils-build/libiberty/pic -liberty'<br><br>However, in the final (chapter 10) build of binutils, this libtool file line results as;<br><br>dependency_libs=' '<br><br><br>At a glance, this looks like some weirdness with the '--enable-shared' switch<br>supplied to the configure script, which somehow construes...<br><br> WIN32LIBADD="-L../libiberty/pic -liberty"<br><br>...or part thereof, at or around line 18898 in binutils-2.xx/bfd/configure .<br><br> <br>I believe dependency_libs=' ' is probably
correct.<br><br><br>Regards,<br><br>Don <br><br><hr>Enter today! <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.livelife.ninemsn.com.au/compIntro.aspx?compId=4602">Win a Hotmail Go-Kart to race at Bathurst.</a></div></div></div><br>
</body></html>