[Clfs-dev] Open Publication License and Copyrights?

[Bryan Baldwin]

On 07/03/2013 11:32 PM, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> LFS itself is under MIT and a CC license

As it is dual-licensed, one of which is MIT which permits sublicensing
w/o restriction, your argument is invalid.

This is why non-copyleft licenses are horrible and stupid for software.
Using them dramatically increases the chance of forking. Although such
licenses guarantee that your contribution to the covered work can be
shared and modified by others, it says nothing about others sharing
their work back with you. Don't use them.

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-clfs.org/attachments/20130703/1b4a44d8/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature_sml.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10748 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.clfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-clfs.org/attachments/20130703/1b4a44d8/attachment-0002.png>