[Clfs-dev] [ GIT-0.0.1-20120922-arm] Update to clean up ${CLFS}/sources

[Andrew Bradford]

On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:48:42 -0800
Jasmine Iwanek <jasmine at iwanek.co.uk> wrote:

> On 2013-02-05 20:23, knjterrell at mybluelight.com wrote:
> > From: kanj <knjterrell at mybluelight.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml |    3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml 
> > b/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml
> > index 5b6bf54..4484f0d 100644
> > --- a/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml
> > +++ b/BOOK/cleanup/remove-files.xml
> > @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/src/*
> >  rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/include
> >  rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/man
> >  rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/usr/share/man
> > -rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/build</userinput></screen>
> > +rm -rfv ${CLFS}-final/build
> > +rm -rfv ${CLFS}/sources</userinput></screen>
> > 
> >    <para>Remove the static libaries:</para>
> 
> Not to be overly whiny or anything, but why exactly do you have an 
> adver-spam link in your signature?

I don't think the submitter has control over that.  The ISP at
mybluelight.com seems to be a budget one which may insert the sig even
if the customer doesn't want it.  Don't worry, the sig won't make it
into the patch when applied.

Thanks,
Andrew