[Clfs-dev] FW: 10.17 ncurses

[Grail Dane]

Thank you ... thank you ... thank you
i knew it was going to be a stupid mistake 
Recompiling now so fingers crossed :)
cheersgrail

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:43:47 -0400
From: jciccone at gmail.com
To: clfs-dev at lists.cross-lfs.org
Subject: Re: [Clfs-dev] FW: 10.17 ncurses



  


    
  
  
    Check which patches you applied to gcc, it sounds to me like you
    applied the specs patch where you should not have.

    

    On 07/21/2010 07:41 PM, Grail Dane wrote:
    
      
      Ok ... so I have re-compiled and installed gcc and it is still
      connected to the wrong interpreter.
      

      
      When I run - readelf -l /usr/bin/gcc | grep lib
      

      
      It returns - [Requesting program interpreter:
        /tools/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
      

      
      So now I am back to square one of asking if anyone can think
        of what I have missed?
      

      
      I have reconfirmed that all executables compiled prior to gcc
        (chapter 10.15) when used with the same
      command above returns:
      

      
      [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
      

      
      Again any help would be appreciated :)
      

      
      cheers
      grail

        

        From: grail69 at hotmail.com

        To: clfs-dev at lists.cross-lfs.org

        Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:13:15 +0000

        Subject: [Clfs-dev] FW: 10.17 ncurses

        

        Right ... so it appears I should be a little embarrassed 
        

        
        I guess ranting helps because after saying all my other
          installed applications were working ok I found that everything
          installed priorto gcc is linked correctly
        but not after. Therefore both sed and ncurses apps are
          linked incorrectly :(
        

        
        I tested a few things like ar and ld with readelf -l and
          they are using the correct interpreter.
        Yet /usr/bin/gcc, /bin/sed and /usr/bin/clear are all using
          the wrong interpreter, ie still the on in /tools/lib
        

        
        I will be back if I can't figure out where I went wrong.
        

        
        cheers
        grail

          

          From: grail69 at hotmail.com

          To: clfs-dev at lists.cross-lfs.org

          Subject: 10.17 ncurses

          Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:40:13 +0000

          

          I am hoping someone will put me out of my misery here :(

          

          I have restarted my current build of Pure64 several times
          lately and keep getting stuck here.

          

          My issue is that every time I install ncurses (and to let you
          know I have resorted to copy and pasting directly from the web
          site into my terminal) the installed programs seem to be
          linking incorrectly.

          

          I know I have probably missed something simple, as I have been
          past this stage before, but for the life of me I cannot find
          where.

          

          So my test to tell me i am doing something wrong is the
          following:

          

          1. Complete install of ncurses (this includes both with all
          extra move after make install and without)

          

          2. Run /usr/bin/clear, which is installed by ncurses

          

          output:

          

          clear: error while loading shared libraries: libncursesw.so.5:
          cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

          

          3. Run find / -name libncursesw.so.5

          

          output:

          

          /lib/libncursesw.so.5

          

          4. Test linkages - ldd /usr/bin/clear

          

          output:

          

              linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007ffff6b8b000)

              libncursesw.so.5 => not found

              libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f0ee4a02000)

              /tools/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f0ee4d60000)

          

          As you can see it is linking against /tools/<blah> and
          yet both libc.so.6 and ld-linux-x86x64.so.2 exist in /lib

          

          My only deviation from the rest of CLFS Pure64 is to install
          glibc instead of eglibc. Can't see why this would cause
          issues?? And on testing other applications in the Chapter 10
          section they all seemed to be linked ok.

          

          Any advice would be greatly appreciated

          

          cheers grail

          

          Find it at CarPoint.com.au New,
            Used, Demo, Dealer or Private?
        

        Meet local singles online. Browse
          profiles for FREE!
      

      Find it on Domain.com.au Need a new place to live?
      
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev at lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org

    
    
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Need a new place to live? Find it on Domain.com.au
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clfs.org/pipermail/clfs-dev-clfs.org/attachments/20100722/56a5d1ef/attachment-0001.htm>