[Clfs-dev] Broken Link in CLFS Developement

Joe Ciccone jciccone at gmail.com
Sat Sep 13 08:15:04 PDT 2008


Andrew Rowland wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 10:35 -0400, Joe Ciccone wrote:
>   
>> wwh04660 at ucmo.edu wrote:
>>     
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>> I built for ppc64 a few months ago before Joe released 1.1.0 rc1.
>>>
>>> We all did a bunch of testing, however I didn't follow the links in
>>> the book.
>>> download-lists is what I used.
>>>
>>> Good catch. Although, I'm afraid that more links are going to bread
>>> even before release and after release.
>>>
>>>       
>> This is always a possibility beyond our control.
>>     
> I'm sure this has been been considered and determined completely stupid,
> but how about keeping the tarballs for the latest stable release on the
> CLFS server?  Then it's not beyond our control.  According to du -h on
> my machine, all of the tarballs and patches occupy 211M.  And I believe
> that's every arch.  Just my 2 cents.
>   
We already do, the book just doesn't point to them. I think it would
just be a crap load of excess bandwidth to do that. Not to mention, trac
puts a huge load on the server already.




More information about the Clfs-dev mailing list