[Clfs-commits] [CLFS Trac] #145: Linux 2.6.24.3
CLFS Trac
trac at cross-lfs.org
Sun Mar 23 14:44:03 PDT 2008
#145: Linux 2.6.24.3
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jciccone | Owner: clfs-commits at lists.cross-lfs.org.
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: BOOK | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ken):
Replying to [comment:2 kb0iic]:
> Update on using 2.6.24.3 headers for a build.
>
> Do not use these headers for a build. Animeloe and I both had issues
when using these headers and continuing into CBLFS.
>
> Most common error to be seen when using these headers:
>
> error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before
<anythinghere>
>
> If someone decides to build with 2.6.24.3 headers and is successful
through cblfs, let us know. Maybe we actually screwed something up.
I wouldn't dream of using 2.6.24.3 (nothing obviously-relevant to me since
2.6.24.2, and I've got plenty of other things to do rather than patch the
immediate problem in headers_check). But, 2.6.24.4 is due out very soon -
do you have examples of which packages failed, so that *somebody* can test
? Also, if it is still a problem in 2.6.24.4 that should help us assess
the extent of the damage - one or two uncommon packages implies they
should be patched (I've seen this in the past for e.g. strace), general
breakage of common packages implies the kernel itself maybe needs to be
fixed before 2.6.25, or at least made aware there are issues.
Your example looks very like what happens if a header is missing. I'm not
saying you made a mistake, perhaps these packages were expecting something
which has now disappeared.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.cross-lfs.org/ticket/145#comment:3>
CLFS Trac <http://trac.cross-lfs.org>
The Cross Linux From Scratch Project.
More information about the Clfs-commits
mailing list